Key Points

Question: What is the cost to the US economy of socioeconomic health inequities?

Meaning: The costs of socioeconomic health inequities are unacceptably high and warrant societal investments in policies and interventions to promote health equity.

Abstract

The study used cross-sectional analysis using nationally representative data to estimate the economic burden of socioeconomic health inequities in the US. The data included 2016-2019 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), state-level Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS), 2016-2018 mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), and 2018 IPUMS American Community Survey (ACS).

87,855 survey respondents to MEPS, 1,792,023 survey respondents to the BRFSS, and 8,416,203 death records from the NVSS were examined to determine the sum of excess medical care costs, lost labor market productivity, and excess premature death costs.

Background

Life expectancy for adults without a four-year college degree has grown from 2.6 to 6.3 years over the last three decades. Educational attainment is associated with healthier lifestyle decisions and higher levels of health literacy, providing individuals with access to higher income and wages, better employment, and greater wealth. Persistent wage stagnation and the erosion of satisfactory jobs for high school-educated adults reduce their ability to access resources that are a prerequisite for people to achieve high levels of health and wellness.

Methods

Estimating the Health Equity Goals

We established the 90th percentile for the prevalence rates of health conditions and the 10th percentile for crude death rates as health equity goals. The prevalence models for each were established using the MEPS adult sample, with the dependent variable being the dichotomous variable indicating whether the respondent had been diagnosed with the condition. The independent variables included age, sex, marital status, educational attainment, poverty status, health insurance status, and region of the country.

We estimated each respondent’s risk for 13 health conditions: fair/poor health, diabetes, joint pain/arthritis, depression, limitation of activities, hypertension, high cholesterol, stroke, heart attack, coronary heart disease/angina, asthma, emphysema/chronic bronchitis, and cancer. Next, we divided the sample into 13 cohorts based on sex and age. Our age groups included 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75 and over.

To compute years of life lost due to premature death, we used the death rate of the state at the 10th percentile for six age groups: 25-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-77 as the targeted crude death rate. We ordered from lowest to highest crude death rate for each age group and used that information as the health equity goal for that age category.

Estimating the Excess Morbidity on Medical Care Costs and Labor Market Productivity of Socioeconomic Health Inequities in the US

We used the same methodology to estimate the burden of racial and ethnic inequities to estimate excess medical care costs, lost labor market productivity, and excess premature death costs. To estimate excess medical care costs, we built a regression model that used data from the 2018 MEPS and created a two-part estimation technique. The first part is a logistic regression model, which estimates the impact of health conditions on the probability of having any type of medical care expenditures. Second is a generalized linear model (GLM), which estimates the impact of health conditions on levels of expenditures for individuals with positive expenditures. The dependent variable is the total medical expenditures. The predictor variables are whether respondents had the following health conditions listed above and included the same independent variables.

To compute the value of lost productivity, we estimated the impact of health conditions on disability and illness on sick days, annual hours of work, and wages for working-age adults ages 25-64. Similar to the above, we used a two-part technique. The first part estimates the impact of health conditions on the probability of having a nonzero sick day, annual hours, and wages. The second part estimates the impact of health conditions on the number of sick days, hours worked, and hourly wages, with the key predictor variables being health conditions.

We also simulated medical care costs and labor market outcomes using the reported health conditions. Then, we simulated the medical care cost and labor market outcome by assigning each group the target prevalence rate for each condition within the age/sex cohort. The respondents in each cohort were randomly assigned health conditions using a uniform distribution so the prevalence rate for the condition would be at the 90th percentile. We computed the cost of inequity and the predicted values for medical care costs using Monte Carlo simulations for the education groups. We randomly chose 1,000 samples to get “one” predicted probability and “one” predicted mean for the models. This exercise was repeated 1,000 times to get 1,000 predicted probabilities, and 1,000 predicted means by the education group.

Estimating the Costs of Excess Premature Death

Research suggests that society is willing to pay from $100,000 to $264,000 for a year of life, which provides a way to value the loss of life due to premature death we defined as any death occurring prior to age 78. We used data from NVSS to obtain the number of deaths by education and age for 2016-2018. The age groups comprised 25-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-77. We also used data from the 2018 American Community Survey five-year estimates to obtain popular size estimates for each subgroup based on age and the highest level of education in each state. We suppressed all counts under ten observations per our data use agreement with the NCHS to improve the reliability of our crude death rate estimates.

Next, we estimated the number of deaths that would have occurred for each education group if every group’s death rate were equal to the health equity target death rate within each age category. The difference between the actual number of deaths and the expected deaths represents “excess premature deaths.” Then we computed the number of years of life lost in each education group by assuming all people would live to 78, which we did by using the difference between 78 and the midpoint in each age group.

Estimating Economic Burden for Health Inequities for Each State

We modified the methodology we used to estimate the economic burden when estimating the burdens for individual states. MEPS data could not be used since the sample is too small and not designed for state-level analyses. Instead, we utilized data from BRFSS, but the data were too small, so we pooled four years of data to compute prevalence rates for each education category in each state. We then compared these rates to the 90th percentile target for the entire adult population and used the regression models to simulate their medical care costs and labor market outcomes. Then we compared these costs and results based on the actual prevalence rates to the target prevalence rates. Finally, we re-weighted estimates to match the size of less than high school, high school/GED, and some college populations in each state. We pooled data across three years for premature death costs to get stable estimates in each category.

BRFSS data could not be broken into different age-sex cohorts because they were too small. Therefore to produce consistent estimates between the national estimates that relief on the MEPS and the state-level BRFSS estimates, we employed a “calibration” approach that consisted of using 2016-2019 BRFSS national data to compute socio-demographic proportions and health conditions for 12 different age-sex cohorts to estimate the medical care costs and labor market estimates for eight different age-sex cohorts. The MEPS population numbers from 2018 were also used for each age-sex cohort. Using these results, we produced a series of adjustment factors by SES category, which accounted for the differences between estimates.

Results

The study found that the estimated cost of socioeconomic health inequities in 2018 was up to $978 billion and up to 4.69% of the GDP. 65.4% of those costs were incurred by adults with a high school diploma or a GED. However, the study also found that while adults without a high school diploma are only 9% of the population, they were responsible for 26% of the costs.

View All Tables and Figures

Discussion

Given the growing gap in life expectancy and the persistent education-health gradient, the economic costs of SES health inequity will grow over time. The nation needs to address the increasing inequity of social justice and economic reasons through a plan that would parallel address racial and ethnic inequities. In the study, we observed higher rates of fair/poor health, depression, and other health, depression, and other health conditions for female cohorts in the BRFSS data compared to the MEPS data, which was due to the differences in the prevalence of the health status and conditions between the data sets. Also, crude deaths for adults with some college education vary across states. Some have crude death rates for adults, with some college education exceeding the health equity target by more than the national rate.

This study’s findings highlight the importance of addressing the health inequities faced by adults who are not college-educated. Not only are these health inequities devastating to the mortality and morbidity of the US population, but also the US economy. The study estimates that the economic burden of SES health inequities is up to $978 billion, which is over 4% of the annual GDP. Policymakers should consider considerable measures to improve the health status of Americans who are not college educated.

  1. Amick BC, Levine S, Tarlov AR, Walsh DC, eds. Society and Health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  2. Julia C, Valleron AJ. Louis-Rene Villerme (1782-1863), a pioneer in social epidemiology: re-analysis of his data on comparative mortality in Paris in the early 19th century. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(8):666-670. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.087957.
  3. Minority Health and Health Disparities: Definitions and parameters. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities. https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/strategic-plan/nih-strategic-plan-definitions-and-parameters.html. Accessed April 24, 2022.
  4. Case A, Deaton A. Life expectancy in adulthood is falling for those without a BA degree, but as educational gaps have widened, racial gaps have narrowed. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(11):e2024777118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2024777118.
  5. Case A, Deaton A. The great divide: Education, despair and death. NBER. https://www.nber.org/papers/w29241. Published September 13, 2021. Accessed April 24, 2022.
  6. James K, Jordan A. The Opioid Crisis in Black Communities. J Law Med Ethics. 2018;46(2):404-421. doi: 10.1177/1073110518782949.
  7. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Committee on National Statistics; Committee on Population; Committee on Rising Midlife Mortality Rates and Socioeconomic Disparities; Becker T, Majmundar MK, Harris KM, editors. High and Rising Mortality Rates Among Working-Age Adults. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2021.
  8. Woolf SH, Masters RK, Aron LY. Effect of the covid-19 pandemic in 2020 on life expectancy across populations in the USA and other high income countries: simulations of provisional mortality data. BMJ. 2021;373:n1343. Published 2021 Jun 23. doi:10.1136/bmj.n1343.
  9. GBD US Health Disparities Collaborators. Life expectancy by county, race, and ethnicity in the USA, 2000-19: a systematic analysis of health disparities. Lancet. 2022;400(10345):25-38. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00876-5.
  10. Avendano M, Kawachi I. Why do Americans have shorter life expectancy and worse health than do people in other high-income countries?. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:307-325. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182411.
  11. Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(2):60-76. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.60.
  12. Ross CE, Wu Cl. The links between education and health. American Sociological Review, 1995;60(5), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096319.
  13. Mechanic D. Population health: challenges for science and society. Milbank Q. 2007;85(3):533-559. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00498.x.
  14. Currie J. Healthy, wealthy, and wise: socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood, and human capital development. Journal of Economic Literature. 2009;47 (1): 87-122.DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.1.87.
  15. Conti G, Heckman J, Urzua S. THE EDUCATION-HEALTH GRADIENT. Am Econ Rev. 2010;100(2):234-238. doi:10.1257/aer.100.2.234.
  16. Cutler DM, Lleras-Muney A. Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. J Health Econ. 2010;29(1):1-28. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.003.
  17. Pickett KE, Wilkinson RG. Income inequality and health: a causal review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:316-326. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.031.
  18. Howell DR, Kalleberg AL. Declining Job Quality in the United States: Explanations and Evidence. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2019;5(4), 1–53. doi:10.7758/RSF.2019.5.4.01.
  19. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991;337(8754):1387-1393. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-k.
  20. Dugravot A, Fayosse A, Dumurgier J, et al. Social inequalities in multimorbidity, frailty, disability, and transitions to mortality: a 24-year follow-up of the Whitehall II cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5(1):e42-e50. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30226-9.
  21. Reardon SF, Bischoff K. Income inequality and income segregation. AJS. 2011;116(4):1092-1153. doi:10.1086/657114.
  22. Hoffmann F, Lee DS, Lemieux T. Growing income inequality in the United States and other advanced economies. The Journal of Economics Perspectives. 2020;34(4), 52-78. doi: 10.1257/jep.34.4.52.
  23. Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):5-8. doi:10.1177/00333549141291S203.
  24. Braveman PA, Kumanyika S, Fielding J, et al. Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice. Am J Public Health. 2011;101 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S149-S155. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.300062.
  25. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41 (5): 917–928. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007.
  26. Bureau USC. U.S. Census Bureau releases New Educational Attainment Data. Census.gov. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020/educational-attainment.html. Published October 8, 2021. Accessed April 24, 2022.
  27. Espinosa LL, Turk JM, Taylor M, Chessman HM. Race and ethnicity in higher education: a status report. ACE. https://www.equityinhighered.org/indicators/u-s-population-trends-and-educational-attainment/educational-attainment-by-race-and-ethnicity/. Published 2019. Accessed April 24, 2022.
  28. US Bureau of Labor Statistics: Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by age, sex, and race. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2022.

Table 3. Economic Burden of Excess Medical Care Expenditures, Loss of Productivity, and Premature Death Attributed to Education-Related Health Inequities for the Nation ($ Billions)

  • Abbreviations: BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; MEPS, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; NVSS, National Vital Statistics System.
  • State-level estimates for adults with 4-year college or more were not computed because the study focuses on burden of health inequities for adults with lower educational attainment.

 

Cost, $ in billions

Outcome

Less than high school

High school / GED

Some College

Total health inequities for adults with <4-year college degree

4-year college degree or more

Total

MEPS and national NVSS estimates

Excess medical care costs

37.4

62.1

48.3

147.8

27.9

175.7

Lost labor market productivity

30.4

67.4

59.0

156.8

7.4

164.2

Premature death

175.9

455.4

4.5

635.8

0.0

635.8

Total

243.7

584.9

111.8

940.4

35.3

975.7

BRFSS and state NVSS estimates

Excess medical care costs

44.5

64.1

46.3

154.9

 

 

Lost labor market productivity

32.4

72.3

69.3

154.9

 

 

Premature death

178.9

457.0

12.9

648.7

 

 

Total

255.8

593.4

128.5

977.7

 

 

Table 4. Economic Burden per Capita for Education-Related Health Inequities for Each State and the District of Columbia in 2018

Table 4 from the Socioeconomic Health Report. The bar graph is a visual representation of each number for purposes of comparison.

  • Per-capita costs were computed by dividing populations of each education group for adults older than 25 years.
  • State-level estimates for adults with 4-year college or more were not computed because the study focuses on burden of health inequities for adults with lower educational attainment. The US per-capita estimate for adults with a 4-year college degree was $514.
Total Economic Burden
State Total Economic Burden
AL 28431
AK 2278
AZ 16484
AR 13210
CA 59463
CO 11203
CT 7380
DE 3523
DC 2710
FL 57230
GA 32384
HI 2727
ID 3974
IL 3974
IN 24224
IA 8749
KS 8264
KY 26132
LA 23145
ME 4621
MD 19037
MA 18343
MI 43710
MN 10209
MS 15561
MO 23704
MT 2689
NE 5220
NV 7864
NH 4443
NJ 20577
NM 7930
NY 36411
NC 48508
ND 1625
OH 47793
OK 16800
OR 10551
PA 43518
RI 2616
SC 42871
SD 2488
TN 36302
TX 71127
UT 5295
VT 1824
VA 22055
WA 19095
WV 6154
WI 14068
WY 1655
Less than High School
State Less than High School
AL 19194
AK 14804
AZ 7373
AR 15356
CA 3152
CO 6623
CT 5421
DE 10815
DC 14396
FL 8507
GA 11200
HI 4572
ID 8524
IL 7798
IN 12978
IA 9106
KS 8888
KY 21372
LA 19291
ME 14075
MD 11295
MA 6833
MI 20842
MN 7005
MS 18415
MO 16296
MT 13769
NE 7395
NV 4691
NH 12328
NJ 4691
NM 10816
NY 3631
NC 15833
ND 10014
OH 15706
OK 14731
OR 8785
PA 10217
RI 8464
SC 19954
SD 12145
TN 19082
TX 5815
UT 8100
VT 15049
VA 13246
WA 17037
WV 11318
WI 8827
WY 12029
High School / GED
State High School / GED
AL 16535
AK 10837
AZ 7945
AR 11448
CA 6280
CO 9653
CT 7241
DE 11418
DC 22430
FL 8069
GA 9355
HI 7085
ID 7586
IL 9352
IN 10643
IA 9145
KS 10306
KY 14738
LA 11145
ME 9423
MD 11857
MA 11836
MI 13225
MN 7426
MS 12321
MO 11165
MT 7683
NE 11884
NV 9662
NH 10819
NJ 8868
NM 11066
NY 6614
NC 14467
ND 8108
OH 11733
OK 11846
OR 8632
PA 9621
RI 7336
SC 25555
SD 8817
TN 14553
TX 10452
UT 6661
VT 7939
VA 8597
WA 7283
WV 6201
WI 7263
WY 8784
Some College
State Some College
AL 2391
AK 1944
AZ 1958
AR 1866
CA 1478
CO 1171
CT 1993
DE 2362
DC 2532
FL 1794
GA 2335
HI 1311
ID 1993
IL 1072
IN 1520
IA 1956
KS 2672
KY 2677
LA 2588
ME 2467
MD 2136
MA 1423
MI 1909
MN 1162
MS 3874
MO 2041
MT 1582
NE 1214
NV 1625
NH 2739
NJ 1800
NM 3587
NY 1846
NC 4223
ND 1131
OH 1839
OK 3305
OR 2499
PA 1997
RI 1791
SC 8374
SD 2124
TN 2845
TX 1337
UT 2228
VT 2572
VA 1287
WA 1993
WV 2850
WI 1946
WY 2309
Economic Burden per Capita for Education-Related Health Inequities for Each State and the District of Columbia in 2018
  Cost, $
Location Less than high school High school / GED Some college
AL 19194 16535 2391
AK 14804 10837 1944
AZ 7373 7945 1958
AR 15356 11448 1866
CA 3152 6280 1478
CO 6623 9653 1171
CT 5421 7241 1993
DE 10815 11418 2362
DC 14396 22430 2532
FL 8507 8069 1794
GA 11200 9355 2335
HI 4572 7085 1311
ID 8524 7586 1993
IL 7798 9352 1072
IN 12978 10643 1520
IA 9106 9145 1956
KS 8888 10306 2672
KY 21372 14738 2677
LA 19291 11145 2588
ME 14075 9423 2467
MD 11295 11857 2136
MA 6833 11836 1423
MI 20842 13225 1909
MN 7005 7426 1162
MS 18415 12321 3874
MO 16296 11165 2041
MT 13769 7683 1582
NE 7395 11884 1214
NV 4691 9662 1625
NH 12328 10819 2739
NJ 4691 8868 1800
NM 10816 11066 3587
NY 3631 6614 1846
NC 15833 14467 4223
ND 10014 8108 1131
OH 15706 11733 1839
OK 14731 11846 3305
OR 8785 8632 2499
PA 10217 9621 1997
RI 8464 7336 1791
SC 19954 25555 8374
SD 12145 8817 2124
TN 19082 14553 2845
TX 5815 10452 1337
UT 8100 6661 2228
VT 15049 7939 2572
VA 13246 8597 1287
WA 17037 7283 1993
WV 11318 6201 2850
WI 8827 7263 1946
WY 12029 8784 2309
US (overall) 9467 9982 2028
Mean (SD) across states 11,525 (4,843) 20,371 (3,363) 2,229 (1,113)

Table 5. Economic Burden of Racial and Ethnic and Education-Related Health Inequities

Table 5 compares data from both this report and the Racial and Ethnic Health Report.

  • The “Racial and ethnic health inequities” totals do not compute state-level estimates for the White population and adults with 4-year college or more because the study focuses on burden of health inequities for disadvantaged populations.
  • The “Education-related health inequities” fields are divided by the 2018 gross domestic product for each states and the nation, which are published by The Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Economic Burden of Racial and Ethnic and Education-Related Health Inequities
  Racial and ethnic health inequities Education-related health inequities
Location Total, $ in million Share of gross domestic product, % Total, $ in million Share of gross domestic product, %
AL 13741.2 6.12 28431 12.66
AK 2253.9 4.11 2278 4.15
AZ 7867.7 2.35 16484 4.92
AR 4652.6 3.58 13210 10.18
CA 39502.5 1.31 59463 1.97
CO 4131.4 1.10 11203 2.97
CT 2330.3 0.83 7380 2.64
DE 1839.3 2.40 3523 4.60
DC 3487.4 2.45 2710 1.90
FL 27346.5 2.58 57230 5.40
GA 21156.0 3.52 32384 5.38
HI 4457.5 4.77 2727 2.92
ID 1407.0 1.79 3974 5.05
IL 29253.8 3.32 3974 5.05
IN 6849.7 1.84 24224 6.52
IA 1533.4 0.80 8749 4.54
KS 3541.8 2.09 8264 4.87
KY 4097.8 1.94 26132 12.35
LA 15308.8 5.99 23145 9.06
ME 280.6 0.43 4621 7.07
MD 14412.7 3.45 19037 4.56
MA 3637.0 0.63 18343 3.19
MI 16074.9 2.99 43710 8.14
MN 4620.2 1.23 10209 2.72
MS 10290.0 8.89 15561 13.44
MO 8673.9 2.68 23704 7.33
MT 1367.2 2.75 2689 5.42
NE 1483.7 1.19 5220 4.18
NV 8748.2 5.18 7864 4.66
NH 284.3 0.33 4443 5.16
NJ 10287.3 1.62 20577 3.24
NM 5933.5 5.85 7930 7.82
NY 18750.5 1.10 36411 2.14
NC 19817.3 3.44 48508 8.43
ND 767.1 1.38 1625 2.92
OH 14868.9 2.16 47793 6.94
OK 7677.2 3.78 16800 8.27
OR 1745.6 0.72 10551 4.34
PA 14723.2 1.83 43518 5.42
RI 1187.0 1.94 2616 4.26
SC 12140.9 5.18 42871 18.29
SD 1587.0 3.02 2488 4.74
TN 11211.9 3.00 36302 9.72
TX 40606.2 2.23 71127 3.91
UT 2565.3 1.42 5295 2.93
VT 47.4 0.14 1824 5.34
VA 11606.4 2.13 22055 4.05
WA 5161.2 0.90 19095 3.31
WV 403.4 0.51 6154 7.77
WI 4568.6 1.33 14068 4.11
WY 229.5 0.58 1655 4.15
Total 12187.6 2086514.0 977675 4.69

Read the Full Report

Racial and Ethnic Health Report

This report estimates the economic burden of racial and ethnic health inequities in the US.

Skip to content